A case was brought on his behalf against him and other issues that were in violation of his Constitutional rights because he was jailed for so long with no charges filed. The before his case was to be heard by the Supreme Court charges were finally filed against him evening. It is thought that this is only done this that the Supreme Court would not hear the full case since the Bush Administration will have been found guilty of wrongdoing. Ironically, no charges were filed which had to do utilizing the allegations of his supposed involvement to detonate a “dirty bomb.” He was charged with lesser and less crimes that are specific Attorney General Ashcroft had stated when he was detained that the data against Padilla was overwhelming. He was subjected to and the length of time he was detained he was not mentally competent to stand trial before he was set to stand trial, Padilla’s attorney tried to argue that because of the torture. A judge ruled that he was competent and he was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 17 years in prison (Martinez, 2007).
On Monday April 4th, 2011 the House of Representatives reviewed the Patriot Act and voted to increase it towards the 8th of December, giving the energy to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and several other federal agencies to still use roving wiretaps among other powers that overstep our rights that are constitutional. February 28th, 2011 was thought to be the final day of the Patriot Act since no legislation that is new been passed. Using this extension, America waits for hearings to be held by the Judiciary Committee. It and Democrats argued against the extension when it came down to voting for the extension many Republicans voted for. However, that which was a shock to a lot of was the known proven fact that sixty-five Democrats voted when it comes to extension of the Patriot Act. One out of particular, Democratic Representative C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger from Maryland, the highest ranking democrat on the Intelligence Committee, want to see this extension all of the way right through to 2013. Many of the 27 Republicans who voted contrary to the extension, such as for instance Dana Rohrabacher, believe the American people will face the best risk of out-of-control prosecutions along with the possibility of out-of-control spy networks effect that is taking.
Groups like the privacy that is electronic Center (EPIC) while the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are fighting for reform of the Patriot Act. The ACLU believes that law enforcement agencies will need advantage of the balance and employ for this capacity to trouble innocent members of the Muslim-American write my paper communities. On March 30th, 2011, the ACLU appeared prior to the House subcommittee from the need for reform regarding the Patriot Act, arguing that the Government tabs on communications without any proof is a violation associated with peoples that are american basic Amendment rights. Senator Patrick Leahy felt that he will never offer the extension since it did nothing to uphold the government’s accountability. EPIC used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIP) to obtain reports on intelligence law violations from the Intelligence Oversight Board. EPIC has spoken on one or more occasion to your Senate Judiciary Committee to require the Attorney General to are accountable to Congress any unlawful investigations under the Patriot Act, yet this battle still continues today.
The lives of both US citizens and immigrant are affected by the charged power of the Patriot Act.
For example, foreigners who seek education through grants, non-citizens looking to gain permanent residency, citizenship, visas and work permits in the us are being scrutinized underneath the new requirement system regarding the Patriot Act. One very high ranking official in the us Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) managed to get clear if there are any doubts regarding an applicant’s eligibility then they will get disapproval. More government that is stringent and thorough background checks are simply another obstacle produced by the Patriot Act. These rules that are new the Patriot Act also not in favor of a lot of the checks and balances through the Bill of Rights that has been placed into spot to protect citizens’ privacy. A discomfort in what they do because their actions are subject to review if the government suspects they are engaging in anything terrorist related at that time, misuse of surveillance powers by law enforcement agencies were uncovered, including the 1974 revelation that the FBI and foreign intelligence agencies had spied on over 10,000 U.S. citizens, including Martin Luther King Jr. Today, citizens utilizing the internet in the privacy of their home feel. For internet surfers, it opens the door for widespread surveillance of web surfing, e-mails and systems that are peer-to-peer. Also place in the middle of the arguments are companies and public libraries that need to turn over any potentially incriminating documents accessed through their systems, at the request of federal police force agencies, without giving any notification to their customers.
I think that particular areas of the Patriot Act are feasible, but only with intensive oversight not only from Congress, but also from the Supreme Court. Congress can are likely involved by ensuring that the statutory laws they pass do not opposed to the protections promised to Americans in the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments of this Constitution. The Supreme Court could continue to review cases to ensure the Constitution is upheld even if it comes to cases that deal with suspected terrorists which are American citizens. Our laws have made this country what it is but it is feared that money maybe the downfall of our nation today. The freedom of life, liberty and property has changed into greed. Terrorist acts from the US terrify many Americans, but in many cases, power and money scares them more. The individuals vote to own government representation however the social people have to be more associated with your decision making process. As americans to make sure that those people do not remain in office if you elect someone to office and they do not do the job correctly, it is up to us. That can simply be done if people have more active in the process that is political not only be happy with how are you affected.
The expression “land of this free” can be used too generously. The way in which it is currently, the Patriot Act goes against everything that this country stands for and deprives all of us of your civil liberties. Some argue you cannot give limitless power to a few and expect things to turn out well that it is necessary to maintain order, but. In the event that Patriot Act is to be kept as law, the folks that people elect into the House of Representatives (House) and Senate want to hold the individuals who use it accountable who overstep or abuse the energy provided to them. Also, the president shouldn’t be the deciding factor in deeming an individual a “threat” or “enemy combatant” when giving an individual such a title strips them of basic human rights. They are occupying, it should be unacceptable for authorities to use tactics that are considered torture when trying to elicit information from an individual, whether that person be an American citizen or not if it is unacceptable for soldiers in war to commit crimes against the people of the nation.
A brief history of the Patriot Act actually dates back to the century that is eighteenth different laws put into place during war time for you to protect the united states.
The protection of our nation may be the highest and also the most important responsibility of our government. The laws created are meant to be within the best interest associated with citizens. The power to look after their welfare and to protect them after all, the citizens give the government. Individuals with this amount of power sometimes pay attention to the whole without rational while the individual has to pay the fee. There should be a limit on the power associated with the government, if the nation’s life style, liberty and quest for property come in jeopardy we need to look at the rational the us government uses when governing this nation. We cannot as a nation just sit back and accept what exactly is being done. In order to elicit change, we must remain true and do some worthwhile thing about it.